AI Desk · Model Identity · Compare

OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano · OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna

Identity similarity: very highExact tokenizer agreement · 50/50Exact agreement across every measured string is strong evidence of shared tokenizer lineage. It shows shared ancestry, and does not on its own establish that these are the same release.

OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano recordOpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna recordOpen in the interactive bench

Tokenizer fingerprint

50 of 50 mutually clean strings agree
Test stringOpenAI: GPT-5 NanoOpenAI: GPT-5.6 LunaVerdict
en-prose1414match
en-long1717match
spaces-2033match
spaces-6033match
tabs-2033match
newlines-2044match
mixed-ws66match
digits-933match
digits-1244match
digits-301010match
digits-sep77match
float-long99match
zh-common1212match
zh-long1717match
zh-rare2020match
ja-kana1010match
ja-kanji1313match
ko1111match
ru1111match
ar1111match
he1010match
hi1111match
th1111match
el1414match
emoji-basic88match
emoji-skin1313match
emoji-zwj-family1111match
emoji-zwj-x33333match
emoji-flags1616match
emoji-prof2020match
math3131match
boxdraw2727match
combining1111match
cjk-ext-b1313match
surrogates4040match
zalgo3535match
rtl-mix55match
py-code2525match
py-indent1515match
json2020match
html1616match
regex4444match
camel66match
snake66match
rare-word-x53131match
repeat-tok2222match
base643434match
hex1111match
url1717match
uuid2727match

Values are the marginal prompt-token cost of each string with the model's fixed overhead subtracted. An x marks a row excluded as corrupt for that model.

API surface

The declared serving contracts differ
FieldOpenAI: GPT-5 NanoOpenAI: GPT-5.6 LunaVerdict
Context length4000001050000× differs
Max output tokens128000128000✓ match
Supported parametersinclude_reasoning, max_completion_tokens, max_tokens, reasoning, reasoning_effort, response_format, seed, structured_outputs, tool_choice, toolsinclude_reasoning, max_completion_tokens, max_tokens, reasoning, reasoning_effort, response_format, seed, structured_outputs, tool_choice, tools✓ match
Defaults{"temperature":null,"top_p":null,"top_k":null,"frequency_penalty":null,"presence_penalty":null,"repetition_penalty":null}{"temperature":null,"top_p":null,"top_k":null,"frequency_penalty":null,"presence_penalty":null,"repetition_penalty":null}✓ match
Reasoning contract{"mandatory":true,"supported_efforts":["high","medium","low","minimal"],"default_effort":"medium"}{"mandatory":false,"default_enabled":true,"supported_efforts":["max","xhigh","high","medium","low","none"],"default_effort":"medium"}× differs
Modalitiestext+image+file->texttext+image+file->text✓ match

Method: tokenizer fingerprinting, v1, 50 strings. Raw data on the data page. This page is static and dated; the interactive bench compares any two of the 422 catalogue models.