YFarmX logoYFarmX
Security Desk · scored board

Model Security Capability

30 frontier models scored on security work, from independent RealVuln runs, the Cybench leaderboard and the labs’ own system cards

How well each frontier model finds, reproduces and writes up vulnerabilities, and what each lab lets it answer. Every score sits beside the three facts that change the number: which harness ran it, how many tasks or repositories it covered, and whether the safeguards were on. A Cybench figure on 35 tasks and one on 40 are two different measurements, and a vendor's own scaffold runs 15 to 30 points above a shared harness, so every row says where its figure came from: an independent RealVuln run, the vendor's system card, or a rival lab's table.

How this board is kept

what the numbers are, where they come from, and how to refresh them

What the numbers are. 30 models with 50 score rows, 18 of them from an independent harness, as of 19 September 2026. A score is a benchmark result: RealVuln's F3, which weights recall nine to one over precision, on a pinned corpus of real repositories; Cybench's end-to-end solve rate on professional capture-the-flag tasks; and the vendors' own security tables, with the labs' published refusal rates beside them. A confidence marker on a row is carried from the research note: CONFIRMED, SINGLE, CONTESTED or UNVERIFIED.

Where they come from. RealVuln pins every repository by commit, hashes the prompt and publishes what each run cost; the board reads version 3.1.0, dashboard generated 11 September 2026. Cybench is 40 tasks, and the vendor's task count is printed beside every row; the leaderboard CSV was read 11 September 2026. Refusal figures come from each lab's own contract: Anthropic's typed refusal object, OpenAI's Model Spec and Daybreak tiers, Google's programmes and the open-weight licences.

What they say. On RealVuln GPT Daybreak Blue leads the model rows at F3 79.5 across all 140 repositories, GPT-5.6 Sol 74.7 and Claude Opus 5 67.7 on the 66-repository Python subset. On Cybench Claude Mythos Preview scores 100% on 35 of 40 tasks. Anthropic's classifiers block 7.0% of defensive discovery on Claude Fable 5.1 against 90.0% on Fable 5 at launch.

The caveats. A vendor-card row and an independent row are two different measurements, so the board labels every row with its provenance and charts the two kinds separately. Vendor scaffolds run roughly 15 to 30 points above a shared harness. RealVuln's micro figures score the repositories a model ran and its strict figures score all 140; a 66/140 row's strict F3 is lower and sits on the model's record. Kolega's own devsec-max stack scores 84.4 with no cost published and is left off the model bars.

The dates on the board. A row is dated by the lab's own release date, which 20 of the 30 models carry; the rest are dated by the board's own measurement, 19 Sept 2026, and follow the dated releases in the default order.

Refresh it. Re-pull the RealVuln dashboard monthly and read the aggregates block; re-read the Cybench CSV on each frontier release:

curl -s -o rv.json https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kolega-ai/Real-Vuln-Benchmark/main/reports/dashboard.json
python3 -c "import json; d=json.load(open('rv.json'))
for k,v in d['aggregates'].items():
    c=v.get('cost') or {}; m=v['micro']
    print(k, v['repos_scored'], m['f3_score'], c.get('cost_per_run'), c.get('cost_per_100_loc'))"

Showing 30 of 30 models

Overview
ModelsOn the board3010 labs · 50 score rows
Independent rowsAuditable harness18of 50; the rest are vendor cards and rival labs' tables
Top model rowRealVuln 3.1.0, all 140 repositories79.5GPT Daybreak Blue · F3, recall weighted nine to one
On RealVulnPinned corpus, published cost14models with a scored run; dashboard generated 11 Sep 2026
Published refusal rateDefensive discovery blocked4models: Sonnet 5 3.2% · Opus 5 13.9% · Fable 5 90% · Fable 5.1 7%
Newest releaseOn the boardDeepSeek V4.1 Flashreleased 10 Sept 2026 · scored 11 Sept 2026

RealVuln F3 · independent, one harness family

  1. GPT Daybreak Blue79.5140/140
  2. GPT-5.6 Sol74.7140/140
  3. Claude Opus 567.766/140
  4. Kimi K359.466/140
  5. GLM-5.356.966/140
  6. GPT-5.556.766/140
  7. GPT-6 Astra52.1140/140
  8. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash50.9140/140
  9. Claude Sonnet 4.647.966/140
  10. Claude Sonnet 543.3140/140
  11. DeepSeek V4 Flash41.8140/140
  12. DeepSeek V4 Pro38140/140
  13. Gemini 3.5 Flash35.566/140
  14. Gemma 4 31B25.466/140

Version 3.1.0, dashboard generated 11 September 2026, ground truth hashed. A 66/140 row was scored on the Python subset; its strict F3 against all 140 is lower and is on the model's record. Kolega's own devsec-max stack scores 84.4 with no cost published and is left off the model bars.

Cybench · vendor card rows, tasks run

  1. Claude Mythos Preview100%35/40
  2. Claude Opus 4.796%35/40
  3. Claude Opus 4.693%37/40
  4. Claude Opus 4.582%39/40
  5. Muse Spark65.4%40/40
  6. Grok 4.643%40/40

Leaderboard CSV read 11 September 2026. The full 26-row leaderboard, with the subtask figures and the corrected HAL rows, is on the Cybench page.

Defensive discovery blocked · published rates

  1. Claude Fable 590%15% flagged
  2. Claude Opus 513.9%0.61% flagged
  3. Claude Fable 5.17%1.03% flagged
  4. Claude Sonnet 53.2%0.52% flagged

Anthropic is the one lab publishing typed refusal rates; the four figures rest on two independent readings of the Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1 system card.

Every model · most recent release first

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekOpen weightsRealVuln F3 50.92 scoresCONFIRMEDindependent run
  2. GPT-6 AstraOpenAIAPIRealVuln F3 52.13 scoresCONFIRMEDindependent run
  3. Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberGoogleGated programmeCyberGym 86.2%3 scoresCONFIRMEDvendor table
  4. Claude Mythos 5.1AnthropicGated programmeTerminal-Bench 60.9%2 scoresCONFIRMEDvendor table
  5. Claude Fable 5.1AnthropicAPITerminal-Bench 55.8%7% blocked1 scoreCONFIRMEDvendor table
  6. GLM-5.3Z.aiOpen weightsRealVuln F3 56.93 scoresCONFIRMEDindependent run
  7. DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeekOpen weightsRealVuln F3 382 scoresCONFIRMEDindependent run
  8. Grok 4.6xAIAPIPhotoview 2.4.0 authorised pentest 10 of 102 scoresCONFIRMEDindependent run
  9. GPT Daybreak RedOpenAIGated programmerefusal gate on record0 scoresSINGLEgate on record
  10. GPT Daybreak BlueOpenAIGated programmeRealVuln F3 79.51 scoreCONFIRMEDindependent run
  11. Qwen3.8-MaxAlibabaOpen weightsRecent-CVE reproduction campaign 81.25%1 scoreSINGLEindependent run
  12. DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeekOpen weightsRealVuln F3 41.81 scoreCONFIRMEDindependent run
  13. Claude Opus 5AnthropicAPIRealVuln F3 67.713.9% blocked4 scoresCONFIRMEDindependent run
  14. Gemini 3.5 Flash CyberGoogleGated programmeBig Sleep on V8 552 scoresCONFIRMEDvendor table
  15. Kimi K3Moonshot AIOpen weightsRealVuln F3 59.43 scoresCONFIRMEDindependent run
  16. GPT-5.6 SolOpenAIAPIRealVuln F3 74.72 scoresCONFIRMEDindependent run
  17. Claude Sonnet 5AnthropicAPIRealVuln F3 43.33.2% blocked1 scoreCONFIRMEDindependent run
  18. Claude Mythos 5AnthropicGated programmeOSS-Fuzz 80%3 scoresCONFIRMEDvendor table
  19. Claude Fable 5AnthropicAPIExploitBench 7890% blocked2 scoresCONFIRMEDvendor table
  20. Claude Opus 4.8AnthropicAPIrefusal gate on record0 scoresCONFIRMEDgate on record
  21. Muse SparkMetaAPICybench 65.4%1 scoreCONFIRMEDvendor table
  22. Claude Opus 4.5AnthropicAPICybench 82%1 scoreCONFIRMEDvendor table
  23. Claude Opus 4.6AnthropicAPICybench 93%1 scoreCONFIRMEDvendor table
  24. Claude Opus 4.7AnthropicAPICybench 96%1 scoreCONFIRMEDvendor table
  25. Claude Mythos PreviewAnthropicAPICybench 100%1 scoreCONFIRMEDvendor table
  26. Gemma 4 31BGoogleOpen weightsRealVuln F3 25.41 scoreCONFIRMEDindependent run
  27. CyberKimiAdverserial AIWaitlistExploitBench 8 of 162 scoresCONFIRMEDvendor table
  28. Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogleAPIRealVuln F3 35.51 scoreCONFIRMEDindependent run
  29. GPT-5.5OpenAIAPIRealVuln F3 56.72 scoresCONFIRMEDindependent run
  30. Claude Sonnet 4.6AnthropicAPIRealVuln F3 47.91 scoreCONFIRMEDindependent run

Each row opens the model's own record page, with every score, its harness and its sources. Download the data: CSV ·JSON ·RSS · CC BY 4.0 with attribution to YFarmX.

A vendor's figure is the vendor's claim, marked as such. A confidence marker is the research note's, carried onto the row.Board updated · 19 Sept 2026