Model Security Capability
30 frontier models scored on security work, from independent RealVuln runs, the Cybench leaderboard and the labs’ own system cards
How well each frontier model finds, reproduces and writes up vulnerabilities, and what each lab lets it answer. Every score sits beside the three facts that change the number: which harness ran it, how many tasks or repositories it covered, and whether the safeguards were on. A Cybench figure on 35 tasks and one on 40 are two different measurements, and a vendor's own scaffold runs 15 to 30 points above a shared harness, so every row says where its figure came from: an independent RealVuln run, the vendor's system card, or a rival lab's table.
How this board is kept
what the numbers are, where they come from, and how to refresh them
What the numbers are. 30 models with 50 score rows, 18 of them from an independent harness, as of 19 September 2026. A score is a benchmark result: RealVuln's F3, which weights recall nine to one over precision, on a pinned corpus of real repositories; Cybench's end-to-end solve rate on professional capture-the-flag tasks; and the vendors' own security tables, with the labs' published refusal rates beside them. A confidence marker on a row is carried from the research note: CONFIRMED, SINGLE, CONTESTED or UNVERIFIED.
Where they come from. RealVuln pins every repository by commit, hashes the prompt and publishes what each run cost; the board reads version 3.1.0, dashboard generated 11 September 2026. Cybench is 40 tasks, and the vendor's task count is printed beside every row; the leaderboard CSV was read 11 September 2026. Refusal figures come from each lab's own contract: Anthropic's typed refusal object, OpenAI's Model Spec and Daybreak tiers, Google's programmes and the open-weight licences.
What they say. On RealVuln GPT Daybreak Blue leads the model rows at F3 79.5 across all 140 repositories, GPT-5.6 Sol 74.7 and Claude Opus 5 67.7 on the 66-repository Python subset. On Cybench Claude Mythos Preview scores 100% on 35 of 40 tasks. Anthropic's classifiers block 7.0% of defensive discovery on Claude Fable 5.1 against 90.0% on Fable 5 at launch.
The caveats. A vendor-card row and an independent row are two different measurements, so the board labels every row with its provenance and charts the two kinds separately. Vendor scaffolds run roughly 15 to 30 points above a shared harness. RealVuln's micro figures score the repositories a model ran and its strict figures score all 140; a 66/140 row's strict F3 is lower and sits on the model's record. Kolega's own devsec-max stack scores 84.4 with no cost published and is left off the model bars.
The dates on the board. A row is dated by the lab's own release date, which 20 of the 30 models carry; the rest are dated by the board's own measurement, 19 Sept 2026, and follow the dated releases in the default order.
Refresh it. Re-pull the RealVuln dashboard monthly and read the aggregates block; re-read the Cybench CSV on each frontier release:
curl -s -o rv.json https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kolega-ai/Real-Vuln-Benchmark/main/reports/dashboard.json
python3 -c "import json; d=json.load(open('rv.json'))
for k,v in d['aggregates'].items():
c=v.get('cost') or {}; m=v['micro']
print(k, v['repos_scored'], m['f3_score'], c.get('cost_per_run'), c.get('cost_per_100_loc'))"Showing 30 of 30 models
Overview
RealVuln F3 · independent, one harness family
Version 3.1.0, dashboard generated 11 September 2026, ground truth hashed. A 66/140 row was scored on the Python subset; its strict F3 against all 140 is lower and is on the model's record. Kolega's own devsec-max stack scores 84.4 with no cost published and is left off the model bars.
Cybench · vendor card rows, tasks run
Leaderboard CSV read 11 September 2026. The full 26-row leaderboard, with the subtask figures and the corrected HAL rows, is on the Cybench page.
Defensive discovery blocked · published rates
Anthropic is the one lab publishing typed refusal rates; the four figures rest on two independent readings of the Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1 system card.
Every model · most recent release first
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flashindependent run
- GPT-6 Astraindependent run
- Gemini 3.8 Flash Cybervendor table
- Claude Mythos 5.1vendor table
- Claude Fable 5.1vendor table
- GLM-5.3independent run
- DeepSeek V4 Proindependent run
- Grok 4.6independent run
- GPT Daybreak Redgate on record
- GPT Daybreak Blueindependent run
- Qwen3.8-Maxindependent run
- DeepSeek V4 Flashindependent run
- Claude Opus 5independent run
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Cybervendor table
- Kimi K3independent run
- GPT-5.6 Solindependent run
- Claude Sonnet 5independent run
- Claude Mythos 5vendor table
- Claude Fable 5vendor table
- Claude Opus 4.8gate on record
- Muse Sparkvendor table
- Claude Opus 4.5vendor table
- Claude Opus 4.6vendor table
- Claude Opus 4.7vendor table
- Claude Mythos Previewvendor table
- Gemma 4 31Bindependent run
- CyberKimivendor table
- Gemini 3.5 Flashindependent run
- GPT-5.5independent run
- Claude Sonnet 4.6independent run
No models match those filters.
Each row opens the model's own record page, with every score, its harness and its sources. Download the data: CSV ·JSON ·RSS · CC BY 4.0 with attribution to YFarmX.
A vendor's figure is the vendor's claim, marked as such. A confidence marker is the research note's, carried onto the row.Board updated · 19 Sept 2026
