YFarmX logoYFarmX

Crypto News

Pump.fun and Hyperliquid swap daily revenue leads

Pump.fun overtook Hyperliquid in daily revenue on 19 October in DefiLlama's series. Hyperliquid regained the lead by 24 October.

Editorial illustration of a green Pump.fun capsule and bars showing Pump’s $2.18m and Hyperliquid’s $1.92m daily revenue on 19 October.

Listen to this articleListen

Podcasts

Pump.fun and Hyperliquid have exchanged places in daily revenue rankings during October. In DefiLlama's daily series, Pump generated about $2.18 million on 19 October against Hyperliquid's $1.92 million. By 24 October, Hyperliquid was ahead again, at $2.02 million against Pump's $1.53 million.

A revenue leaderboard is a changing record of trading activity, and a short-lived lead can reverse as another day's fees arrive. DefiLlama's revenue figures cover protocol groups; Pump includes pump.fun, PumpSwap and Terminal.

The daily lead changed during the week

DefiLlama’s Pump series records $2,177,760 on 19 October. Its Hyperliquid series records $1,921,508 for the same date.

By 24 October, daily revenue was $1,534,732 for Pump and $2,022,702 for Hyperliquid.

Daily Revenue for the Pump and Hyperliquid protocol groups on 19 and 24 October. Pump includes pump.fun, PumpSwap and Terminal. Source: DefiLlama.
Daily Revenue for the Pump and Hyperliquid protocol groups on 19 and 24 October. Pump includes pump.fun, PumpSwap and Terminal. Source: DefiLlama. Open for full size.

Revenue counts a particular share of the fees

DefiLlama distinguishes the fees paid by traders from the revenue assigned to a platform. For Pump.fun, its published adapter separates the platform’s share from creator payments and cashback. It also tracks graduation and platform fees.

Buybacks introduce a further measure: money spent purchasing tokens for holders. Retained protocol income and holder-directed spending have their own categories. Adding those categories without checking their definitions can count the same economic activity more than once.

Hyperliquid’s fee documentation describes trading fees and how they are distributed. A comparison using gross fees for one platform and a narrower revenue figure for the other would answer a different question.

Fee allocation is a flow, with different definitions for gross fees, revenue and holder-directed spending. Arrows show relationships rather than proportional amounts. Sources: DefiLlama and Hyperliquid.
Fee allocation is a flow, with different definitions for gross fees, revenue and holder-directed spending. Arrows show relationships rather than proportional amounts. Sources: DefiLlama and Hyperliquid. Open for full size.

A daily ranking changes faster than a business

Pump’s activity comes from a token-launch and trading ecosystem. Hyperliquid earns fees across its trading products. Their daily positions respond to different flows of users and transactions, even when a dashboard places them in the same table.

Daily revenue: Pump $2.18m and Hyperliquid $1.92m on 19 October; Pump $1.53m and Hyperliquid $2.02m on 24 October 2026.
Pump led Hyperliquid on 19 October; Hyperliquid led on 24 October. Daily revenue for DefiLlama’s protocol groups, including pump.fun, PumpSwap and Terminal in the Pump group. Source: DefiLlama. Open for full size.

Sources

  1. DefiLlama: Pump daily revenue seriesapi.llama.fi
  2. DefiLlama: Hyperliquid daily revenue seriesapi.llama.fi
  3. DefiLlama: Pump.fun fee and revenue definitionsgithub.com
  4. Hyperliquid: trading feeshyperliquid.gitbook.io

How we use AI